Based on an audit of Church's SEI 700 forms, Church is an amoral, unethical man, who will never tell the entire truth to anyone.

In 2024 and 2025 Church engaged in a  "bifurcated e-filing scheme" . "Bifurcated filing" refers to the act of providing different SEI 700 data sets to the county and to the state that should have been identical --- and the differences exposed by comparing data show  a desire to hide facts from the county and any county constituent or media person who may have thought only to check county documents -- presuming the state filing was the same.   

Procedurally - This bifurcated filing process should never have been made available to Church, 289 other County Supervisors (58x5) or  other people who have county and state filing requirements for county work.  

Case Specific - The incomplete nature of the county documents would not have been accepted  by the state -- and they should not have been accepted by County Clerk, Marina Camacho -- and that's where there is a lot more fraud and conspiracy concerns to be exposed.  

Church e-filed under penalty of perjury and he hid material facts from the county, the state and anyone who tried to oversee him or his activities. 

To expose Church's perjury predilection  and  to remove Church from office,  focus has been put on the bifurcated filing and the data differences related to that only.   There are many other concerns that can and should be discussed after he is dispositioned.    

A "Media Alert" that went out on 2/18/2026 can be found at:   https://mcar-concerns-2023.bryancanary.com/mry-cty/sup-glenn-church 

This is atypical for a audit reporting due to  Backstory and excessively egregious nature of the behavior and volume of perjury and fraud

12/11/2025 -Demand for Accountability and Transparency  to Supervisor Glenn Church and Marilyn Vierra  (Non responsive answer returned - no duty to answer)  view gDoc   view pdf   

1/26/2026 - Demand for Resignation - Supervisor Glenn Church  with Board copied (no response)
viewEmailPDF //  view demand gDoc  viewDemandPDF  viewPDFpg12  viewPDFpg15 

2/18/2026 -    Notice of Perjury/Fraud to Media and Law Enforcement -- Summary Audit Document  view  gDoc|
Deeper introduction to Church, his father, Vierra (his Chief of Staff and McKenzie (his wife)  view gDoc  

Concerns related to Church started in March 2023, a few months after he entered office.  Four email strings over 3 years exposed evasive writing techniques by he and two of his staff that avoid proper dialogue on critical facts that affected constituents. They simply weren't behaving  like civil servants at all and they seem to have no concern for blowback.  In addition his engagement lawmaking ignored existing laws and logic, with an apparent bias for certain groups.  What he engaged in was complex but it can be explained for those who want to understand what he engaged.  In December 2025 Church was sent a Civil Demand for Transparency and Accountability.  Part of that simply asked him to confirm he wrote his own emails and others in his office wre doing the same. The goal was to meke the emails legally actionable immediately as they alone tell a story.  Church refused and suggested complaints be filed against him if there were concerns.  He stimulated his own Audit and this what came from it. 

"Bifurcated filing" is a phrase i created to describe Church's behavior in 2024 and 2025.  It refers to the act of providing different SEI 700 data sets to the county and to the state that should have been identical --- and the differences exposed by comparing documents show  a desire to hide facts from the county and any county constituent or media person who may have thought only to check county documents -- presuming the state filing was the same.   NOTE: the incomplete nature of the county documents would not have been accepted  by the state -- and they should not have been accepted by the County Clerk, Marina Camacho -- and that's where there is a lot more fraud and conspiracy concerns to be exposed. 

This bifurcated filing process should never have been made available to Church, 289 other County Supervisors (58x5) or  ??? other people who have county and state filing requirements for county work.  

The FPPC and all County Clerks (58) allowed the Creation of improper business process that lost document control
Prior to efiling, the SEI 700 filing process revolved around the presentation of paper documents to the County Clerk - the county clerk would review for completeness,  and accept and stamp if acceptable.  For those she received that were also due to the tate per Statute, for oversite, she/he would then forward a copy to the state (the FPPC) via mail or email. Upon receipt, presumably they would actually review to double check the county clerk (in theory but that isn't happening).

 When e-filing was implemented it seems the FPPC, 58 county clerks and their software vendors decided to just "skip" all rational chain of data and document controls used to manage Republics for 1000's of years.  Accident or Intentional?  What could go wrong, right?

Example of "proper process" - Church's 2023 paper filings
An example of paper filing process is shown below in 2023 when Church physically presented his documents to the County Clerk (and then filed ammendments to those).  

Church presented documents to the county Clerk, they were stamped, but they were patently incomplete. 

Church then ammended those. 

Church's original filing and his ammended statement were then e sent on to the FPPC (buy maile or scanned copy via email) where they were stamped there.  (as evidenced by both county and FPPC stamps on the state document)

NOTE: functionally this represents proper process with the exception that the county clerk seemed not to review his original submssion or his ammendment for basic document completion requirements (mismatched page count to pages, missing pages, missing schedules, missing page count, missing data in key fields, etc). The document stampes shows what proper process looked like (stampted by county and then stamped by state).  the rest is bad form. 

Example of "bifurcated process"  - Church's  2024 and  2025
In 2024 and 2025 Church chose to e-file his data.  In 2024, the data he filed on 3/7/2024 is very different than that he filed with the state on 3/22/2024.  In 2025, the data he filed with the County and State on 3/2/2025, just 45 minutes apart is very different from each other and some of it is not continuous with the filings the year prior. 

These are not mistakes. They are the work of an inversionist -- someoone who confuses facts for sole purpose of confusion and the benefits that brings -- which is privacy and a shield from oversight due to too mcuh complexity.   An example of 10 lies being better than 1 for concealment of identity is below. 

This 2024 and 2024 audit at a simple level exposes 4 acts of perjury. Two bad filings with the County and two bad filings with the state (because he omitted things to the state he did expose to the county that were material too. 

This overt level of purjery and fraud, comparable to a child gettig caught red-handed stealing money from mom's purse or dad's wallet can not be allowed to pass. Church  is behaving in lawless manner with these filings AND that can in fact be seen in his county behavior as well -- this just makes it black and white. 

Church needs to resign immediately and/or injunctions need to be executed immediately ceasing all board activities.